Oral Arguments Schedule
Accommodation for a Disability
If you need an accommodation for a disability when participating in a court program, service, or activity, please contact the ADA Coordinator at the Supreme Court at phone number 539-4700 as far in advance as possible to allow time to provide an accommodation. You are also welcome to send an e-mail to adarequest@courts.hawaii.gov or complete the Disability Accommodation Request Form. The Disability Accommodations Coordinator will try to provide, but cannot guarantee, the requested auxiliary aid, service, or accommodation.
Oral Arguments
Case Details |
Court |
|
No. SCWC-21-0000504, Tuesday, July 1, 2025, 2 p.m. STATE OF HAWAI‘I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. BRIAN LEE SMITH, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee. The above-captioned case has been set for oral argument on the merits at: Supreme Court Courtroom The oral argument will also be livestreamed for public viewing via the Judiciary’s YouTube channel at YouTube.com/hawaiicourts and ‘Ōlelo TV 55 at olelo.org/tv-schedule/. Attorneys for Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee BRIAN LEE SMITH: Attorney for Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant STATE OF HAWAI‘I: NOTE: Order accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 04/29/25. NOTE: Order granting motion to continue oral argument from 06/05/25 to 06/19/25 at 2:00 p.m., filed 05/08/25. NOTE: Order granting motion to continue oral argument from 06/19/25 to 07/01/25 at 2:00 p.m., filed 06/02/25. COURT: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ. Brief Description: The indictment notified Smith that he was subject to a mandatory minimum sentence under Hawai‘i Revised Statutes (“HRS”) § 706-660.1. HRS § 706-660.1 is titled “Sentence of imprisonment for use of a firearm, semiautomatic firearm, or automatic firearm in a felony.” It states that a person convicted of a felony, “where the person had a firearm in the person’s possession or threatened its use or used the firearm while engaged in the commission of the felony, whether the firearm was loaded or not, and whether operable or not,” in addition to the indeterminate term of imprisonment for the offense, may be sentenced to a mandatory minimum sentence of up to fifteen years for murder in the second degree and attempted murder in the second degree. The statute contains no mens rea modifying “possession,” “threatened use,” or “use.” After his initial conviction was set aside by the Intermediate Court of Appeals on unrelated grounds and the case was remanded for a new trial, Smith filed a motion to strike the HRS § 706-660.1 portions of the indictment. He argued that a sentencing enhancement is an element of the underlying offense and that to satisfy due process requirements, the State must also allege the applicable mens rea in the charging document. The Circuit Court of the Third Circuit agreed and granted Smith’s motion to strike the enhancement from his indictment. The State appealed and the ICA vacated the circuit court’s order. In his application for writ of certiorari Smith asserts that the State must allege and prove state of mind for a minimum sentence enhancement for firearm use or possession. |
Supreme Court |