Skip to Main Nav Skip to Main Content Skip to Footer Content

Eviction moratorium on Maui Island ended on Feb. 4, 2025. For updates, click here.

Oral Arguments before the Intermediate Court of Appeals

NO. 28755 – Wednesday, September 9, 2009 – 9 a.m.

STATE OF HAWAI’I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RIC PADEKEN, Defendant-Appellant

Attorney(s) for Defendant-Appellant
Edie Anne Feldman

Attorney(s) for Plaintiff-Appellee
Honorable Peter B. Carlisle, Prosecuting Attorney and James M. Anderson,
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney

COURT: Watanabe, Nakamura & Fujise, JJ.

Note: Upon direction from the Intermediate Court of Appeals, the names of the minor victim and his/her parents have been removed from the audio file.

[ Listen to the entire audio recording in mp3 format ]

Brief description:

Defendant-Appellant Ric Padeken (Padeken) was convicted after a jury trial of third-degree sexual assault and attempted third-degree sexual assault, in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) ?? 707-732(1)(b) (Supp. 2008), 707-732(1)(c) (Supp. 2008), and 705-500 (1993). On appeal, Padeken asserts that the trial court erred in precluding him, based on Hawaii Rules of Evidence (HRE) Rule 504.1 (psychologist-client privilege) and/or HRE Rule 505.5 (victim-counselor privilege), from using information in psychological reports to cross-examine the complainant. Padeken asserts that notwithstanding the 2004 amendment to Article I, Section 14 of the Hawai`i Constitution, the trial court’s ruling violated his constitutional rights to confront witnesses against him and to due process of law under the United States and Hawai`i Constitutions. Padeken also asserts that the deputy prosecuting attorney engaged in misconduct during the trial.

Chat

KolokoloChat

How can I help you today?

×